{"id":951,"date":"2026-02-04T12:49:01","date_gmt":"2026-02-04T11:49:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/round-robin.eu\/blog\/?p=951"},"modified":"2026-02-26T18:07:03","modified_gmt":"2026-02-26T17:07:03","slug":"japanese-candlesticks-bearish-engulfing-pattern-spotted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/round-robin.eu\/blog\/japanese-candlesticks-bearish-engulfing-pattern-spotted\/","title":{"rendered":"Pattern Spotted: Bearish Engulfing"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

Pattern Spotted is our format where we analyze patterns and configurations as they appear in the markets. This week we discuss the Bearish Engulfing<\/strong> on Brent and Nikkei.<\/small><\/em><\/p>\r\n\r\n

<\/p>\r\n\r\n

The Bearish Engulfing has always fascinated me, and many others, for its immediacy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\"\"<\/a>

chart: Japanese Candelsticks Pattern – Bearish Engulfing<\/p><\/div>\r\n

The reason is simple: it communicates something clear-cut.<\/p>\r\n

Unlike the doji of a potential Evening Star or the long shadow of a Shooting Star, there’s no interpretive ambiguity here.<\/p>\r\n

The trader sees the switch between bulls and bears.<\/p>\r\n

It’s not a shadow \u2014 even a very long one \u2014 that could still accompany a positive close. It’s a decisive turn on the timeframe we’re observing.<\/p>\r\n

The trend is bull. Bulls are dominating. After a new bullish session at the highs (with close > open), they open even higher the next candle.<\/p>\r\n

Then something jams. Bulls can’t push further, profit-taking begins, and the bears exploit the swing to strike.<\/p>\r\n

Not only does it close negative, but it erases the previous candle. It closes below C1’s open.<\/p>\r\n

The beginner’s voice would say: it must be an almost infallible signal, because it speaks clearly and loudly.<\/p>\r\n

That’s not quite the case. Let’s see why.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n

Brent 2018: Three Eloquent Cases<\/h3>\r\n
\"\"<\/a>

chart: Bren weekly – Bearish Engulfing<\/p><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

The Brent weekly chart in 2018 shows us three emblematic situations.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

February.<\/strong> There’s an uptrend, the bearish candle engulfing the bullish one isn’t huge \u2014 it meets the conditions borderline, but it meets them. The problem comes with confirmation: the break of C2’s low rests on the MA20W (orange). This is the entry point. From there, price only rises, sending us to stop loss and continuing its climb until another Bearish Engulfing situation.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

May.<\/strong> My favorite setup. There’s a top on C1 that already retraces \u2014 bulls have lightened up or bears have shown they’re present. The next candle, bulls try again but get rejected below the low of the candle that marked the top. It’s already a de facto reversal. Yet it takes another three weeks to close below C2’s low. This loss of momentum is already a red flag, but the pattern confirmation gives confidence.<\/p>\r\n

Oil doesn’t accelerate downward. Instead, it starts rising again, approaching the stop zone. Momentum is gone.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

What does the manual say?<\/p>\r\n

Do nothing. Stop loss when hit, or go to profit.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

I have a different approach: I entered on a momentum signal, I accepted three weeks to get confirmation \u2014 I can’t accept another four weeks to see profit again. If I do, it means I’m trading something different.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

But let’s stick to the manual: after fifteen weeks it hits stop loss. Exactly one week before making a new top where another Bearish Engulfing occurs.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

October.<\/strong> Very similar to the previous one: C1 with retracement from the top, C2 engulfing C1 and this time plunging deeper. Confirmation comes after two weeks and brings a winning trade, without suffering.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n

What This Case Tells Us<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

Something we often find with Bearish Engulfing, across all timeframes and all markets.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n